Book :: Bain, R. & Ellenbogen, K. M. (2002). Placing objects within disciplinary perspectives: Examples from history and science. In S. G. Paris (Ed.), Perspectives on object-centered learning in museums (pp. 153 - 169). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

last updated: 2008-05-09 14:51:30

Abstract

When trying to understand and improve a practice, such as learning from objects, it makes sense to look into practitioners. Historians, scientists, curators, educators, exhibit developers, and designers are all concerned with the interpretation of objects. Each belongs to a community that uses objects in its work and each community has developed a disciplinary “toolkit” filled with established modes of inquiry, evidentiary criteria, and accepted patterns of analysis to help in their object-related work. The different perspectives of these communities are reflected in the relative strengths and weaknesses of their toolkits. A disciplinary toolkit of an educator, for example, may have pedagogical strengths that contrast with the visual explanation strengths of an exhibit designer. Considering the ways practitioners situate and use objects in their work, therefore, prompts us to reconsider ways we might help learners use objects their learning.


Add Tags
Add relevant words or concepts here. Separate each tag with a comma and a space. For example; learning, informal science, cognition


Tags

Authors
  • No_image_small_mask_ffffff R Bain
  • Kirsten Ellenbogen Kirsten Ellenbogen
    Director of Evaluation & Research in Learning
    Science Museum of Minnesota

Editors
  • No_image_small_mask_ffffff S. Paris